HEADLINES          ARCHIVES          MEDIA CENTER


   
         

March/April 2007 Issue

• New Ways To Preserve Fertility
• Making the Tough Calls: Arthur Caplan, Ph.D.
• Psycho-Oncology: Comprehensive Cancer Care
• Health Briefs: Cholesterol

   
         

New Ways To Preserve Fertility

By Pierpaolo Basso
Editor
March 15, 2007



An improved procedure to freeze a woman's unfertilized eggs for future conception has produced about 160 births in the past year, according to Pasquale Patrizio, M.D, professor of obstetrics, gynecology and reproductive sciences.

The technique, called oocyte cryopreservation (OC), gives hope to women, including those newly diagnosed with cancer who want to preserve their fertility during chemotherapy or radiation.

While OC had been attempted for about fifteen years, it had not met with much success, producing about two babies for every 100 frozen eggs - in part because of the damage done to eggs in the freezing process.

The new OC process takes unfertilized eggs, bathes them in protective solutions, and then cools them slowly to sub-zero temperatures. The freezing stops all biological activity in the tissues, including reactions that would lead to cell death. When restored and re-implanted in patients, the success rate is eight to nine babies per 100, a big advance over the earlier methods.

Because the eggs are not fertilized before freezing, the OC appeals to women who are diagnosed with cancer at a reproductive age, those who oppose embryo-freezing on ethical grounds and those who wish to postpone childbearing for personal economic reasons but wish to use a future partner's sperm. Freezing and re-implanting ovarian tissues, another possible option, have as yet met with limited success.

The changes to OC were devised by Tecnobios Procreazione, a private fertility clinic in Bologna Italy, in response to a 2004 Italian law that bans the freezing of human embryos for IVF and allows only three eggs per patient to be fertilized by donor sperm. OC, since it involves only unfertilized eggs, is permitted.

While the OC process works, much remains to understand why it does. Yale scientists are currently performing molecular analyses of frozen oocytes to understand the basic biology of OC.

The procedure, considered experimental work by The American Society for Reproductive Medicine, has been certified by the Institutional Review Board (IRB), which is formally designated to review and monitor biomedical and behavioral research and ethical issues involving human subjects.

The Center is also engaged in early experimental work involving men who have undergone chemotherapy. Statistics show that about 20 percent of men are at risk or sterility following the cancer, a statistic that researchers hope to remedy by using cryopreservation.

For more see: www.Yale.edu

Print Article      E-Mail Article


BACK TO TOP  
MAIN ARCHIVES  

   
     

March/April 2007


Making the Tough Calls:
Arthur Caplan, Ph.D.

By Ilene Raymond Rush
Editor-in-Chief
March 15, 2007


Arthur L. Caplan, PhD., the Emmanuel and Robert Hart Professor of Bioethics, chair of the Department of Medical Ethics, and the director of the Center for Bioethics at the University of Pennsylvania is a frequent commentator on NPR, CNN and MSNBC. He has authored or edited over 25 books and more than 500 articles in peer reviewed journals in medicine, science, philosophy, bioethics and health policy. His most recent book is Smart Mice, Not So Smart People: An Interesting and Amusing Guide to Bioethics, a compilation of essays that showcases his engagement with topics ranging from cosmetic surgery to biomedical testing.

How did you get started in bioethics?

As a grad student in philosophy I taught a course in medical ethics, an invitation thatled to a new understanding of how philosophy and medicine can work together. I wasn't really aware at that time that there were people who concentrated in bioethical issues.

What were the bioethical issues back then?

The first generation of bio-ethicists concentrated mainly on three medical issues - kidney dialysis, abortion and deciding when someone was legally dead. Research bioethics came into its own beginning with the scandalous facts of the Tuskegee Study in the late 1970's. Since then, bioethics has been spurred by developments in biotechnology, the genetics revolution, and stem cells.

How do you see your role?

I think I have two roles. In my popular work, I think of myself as a kind of prophet, calling out "Stop!" when people seem to be heading in the wrong direction. One issue where I do that is with stem cells and the immense potential they might have to help very sick people. Many people don't understand stem cells. When they think of stem cells and cloning they come up with all sorts of wrong ideas. My role is to warn them that they're making a big mistake.

That's my popular work. In my other role, I deal with research; I do surveys and observational studies. Luckily, the audience for my serious academic stuff and my popular work don't usually overlap!

Humor and bioethics don't seem to go hand-in-hand -what role does humor play in your work?

I use humor in part because it keeps me humble, and lets people know that hey - I could be wrong. But more importantly, using humor allows me to make my positions seem less confrontational and helps me suck in people who are fearful of science and biology. Laughing a little makes it all a little less serious. There are times when people can get offended and there are times when you're talking about issues that require only gravitas. But I've used humor to talk to all sorts of groups, including Catholic bishops, who seemed to appreciate my approach.

What's the biggest bioethical dilemma facing us now?

Without a doubt, it's our failure as a country to have universal access to health care. Our condition is scandalous - we can't have the best health care if 20 percent of people can't afford it and end up being treated in emergency rooms. In research, the most important issue is the new knowledge of the brain and the fast approaching consequences on workplace issues and the law. People often think genetic issues will pose the greatest future problems, but right now it's all about the ethical issues around advances in the science of the brain.

How do you determine which issues are important?

Working in Philadelphia, where there is such a large community of researchers in universities and hospitals, I have wide access to all sorts of practitioners. I attend lectures, go to seminars, and visit researchers to find out what's going on and what issues are coming down the pike that will create questions. Researchers come to me to talk about issues that concern them as well.

What are the most difficult medical ethical issues on the table today?

Perhaps the most difficult are issues are around seriously impaired children - parents don't want to give up care and allow a child to die. It pits the wishes of the parents against those of the state. Legislation designed to protect the handicapped, the Baby Doe Law, says you can't stop care, which can run right into parental rights. It's very tough.

How tough is it being on the front line of so many hotly debated issues?

One of the things I tell young people is that while bioethics isn't easy it is an important and exciting field. I get plenty of contentious hate mail and death threats, but it's been an interesting and lively career. Every morning I wake up wondering what the new issue will be today - I never get bored.

Print Article      E-Mail Article


BACK TO TOP  
MAIN ARCHIVES  

   
     

March/April 2007


Psycho-Oncology: Comprehensive Cancer Care

By Dr. Arianna Burigo
Psychologist Division of Medical Oncology and Immunotherapy: University Hospital of Siena (Italy)
March 15, 2007


Psychological and relational dimensions are main themes in oncology; they concern not only patients but also their relatives and all who work in the field. For this reason, at the Division of Medical Oncology and Immunotherapy of the University Hospital of Siena (Italy), chaired by Michele Maio, M.D. a psycho-oncological service was established. Psychology in oncology (psycho-oncology), takes a comprehensive approach to each individual's needs through education and prevention counseling, research and clinical activities, and training and supervision for workers and volunteers.

Prevention and information
Psycho-oncology offers patients and their family correct information and health education, with the awareness that people who understand their condition and choices have consequent advantage in primary and secondary prevention of future problems.

Clinical activity
The main goal in psycho-oncology is to support and facilitate adaptation to the illness, so that a patient the best possible quality of life throughout. A comprehensive reaction to cancer diagnosis and subsequent treatments depends not only on medical factors, but also on psychological and personal variables. Other factors that affect a patient's psychological reaction to treatment include the types of communication and the quality of relations between a patient and the medical staff, the quality of domestic relationships, and the availability of the social support.

Response to a diagnosis of cancer can vary from normal mood alterations, to adjustment, to psychiatric disorders. The program stresses the importance in assessing the psychological state of each patient so that no patient in distress should go unrecognized or untreated. Psychological intervention in the clinical setting may consist of individual, interpersonal or group therapy, a psycho-diagnostic evaluation, a counseling intervention, or recognition of the need for pharmacological treatment, in consultation with the medical staff.

Education and supervision
Professionals working with cancer patients interact with people who face a complex life condition. It can lead to "burn-out," a specific syndrome that is characterized by physical and emotional exhaustion, low productivity and a sense of individual reduced satisfaction and loss of individual meaning.

A psychological education in oncology requires that one has specific training to recognize the psychological needs of the patient and their family, in order to guarantee a better management of communicative and relational aspects. Moreover, long-lasting supervision for health professionals is essential.

Research activity
Current research covers the field of psycho-biology, with ongoing studies covering the influence of psychological, behavioral and social factors on illness risks and on the survival of cancer patients. Investigations also connect to the psycho-social field, with studies examining the psychological response of patients, their families and caretakers at all stages of the disease. In addition, research activities in psycho-oncology aim to develop new measurement instruments to analyze the efficacy and efficiency of different models of psychosocial intervention currently available in oncology.

Print Article      E-Mail Article


BACK TO TOP  
MAIN ARCHIVES  

   
     

March/April 2007


Health Briefs: Cholesterol

By Ilene Raymond Rush
Editor-in-Chief
March 15, 2007



Don't Stake Your Hopes on Garlic

When it comes to lowering cholesterol levels, garlic stinks, according to a new study from the Stanford University School of Medicine.

Despite decades of conflicting research on the pungent herb's ability to improve heart health, researchers say their study provides the most rigorous evidence to date that consuming garlic on a daily basis-in the form of either raw garlic or two of the most popular garlic supplements-does not lower LDL cholesterol levels among adults with moderately high cholesterol levels.

"It just doesn't work," said senior author Christopher Gardner, PhD, assistant professor of medicine at the Stanford Prevention Research Center. "There's no shortcut. You achieve good health through eating healthy food. There isn't a pill or an herb you can take to counteract an unhealthy diet."

Gardner said the study, published in the Feb. 26 issue of the Archives of Internal Medicine, is the first independent, long-term, head-to-head assessment of raw garlic and garlic supplements.

"If garlic was going to work, in one form or another, then it would have worked in our study," Gardner said. "The lack of effect was compelling and clear. We took cholesterol measurements every month for six months and the numbers just didn't move. There was no effect with any of the three products, even though fairly high doses were used."

Source: Stanford University Press Release
www.Mednews.Stanford.edu

Growth Spurts Yield Lower Readings

Tall toddlers and rapidly growing teens are likely to find themselves with lower cholesterol, particularly the "bad" type, in later life, suggests research in the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. Conversely, piling on the pounds after the age of 15 boosted cholesterol levels, the study showed.

The findings are based on just fewer than 3000 participants of a Medical Research Council long-term study, tracking a representative sample of 5362 people born in one week of March in 1946. Heights and weights were measured at the ages of 2, 4, 7, 15, 36 and 53. When participants reached the age of 53, blood samples were taken to measure cholesterol levels.

When all the figures were analyzed, the results showed that the faster height was gained before the age of 2, and after the age of 15, the lower was the cholesterol level at the age of 53.

Growth in leg length, rather than trunk length, was more strongly associated with lower cholesterol levels.

Higher body fat levels at the ages of 36 and 53, and more rapid weight gain between the ages of 15 and 53, were associated with higher total cholesterol levels, including higher levels of the harmful low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol.

The researchers found that the effects of the growth spurts in either height or girth could not be explained by weight at birth, which is a well-known factor in adult health, or lifetime socioeconomic status.

Click here to view the paper in full:
http://press.psprings.co.uk (PDF - 192k)

Combined Statins To the Rescue

Research from the Methodist DeBakey Heart Center in Houston shows that a combination statin therapy lowers bad cholesterol by an unprecedented 70 percent, and has the added benefit of reducing life-threatening inflammation that can lead to heart disease and stroke.

Results published in the American Journal of Cardiology, also show 46 percent reduction in C-reactive protein (CRP), a marker for inflammation, in patients treated with 40 mg of rosuvastatin and 10 mg ezetimibe.

"A seventy percent drop is the largest reduction in bad cholesterol ever seen in a statin clinical trial. Cardiologists have long recognized the challenge in helping high-risk patients reach their target cholesterol levels, to ultimately prevent heart attack and stroke," said Dr. Christie Ballantyne, cardiologist at the Methodist DeBakey Heart Center and principal investigator for the study. "These results offer hope for these patients."

In addition, inflammation can lead to serious complications such as heart attack and stroke, and high levels of CRP can predict these risks years before they actually occur, Ballantyne said. Physicians have long relied on blood cholesterol as a key indicator of cardiovascular risk, but recent research suggests that high-risk patients who achieved a low CRP level combined with a low LDL-c level had the fewest cardiovascular events.

Source: www.NewsWise.com

Print Article      E-Mail Article


BACK TO TOP  
MAIN ARCHIVES  

   

  TOP 

   CONTACT     OUR POLICY     SHRO     CREDITS

© Copyright 2007, Sbarro Health Research Organization, All Rights Reserved